19 Dec 2009

Hanukkah in Santa Monica

(Video no longer available)


A bit late for the holiday, but still, without a doubt, the best Hanukkah song ever written by a Harvard math professor!
18 Dec 2009

A cybervisit from Down Under

For an amateur blogger, Google Analytics is a fascinating resource. Unlike pro bloggers, I'm not trying to maximize ad revenue (or even generate revenue) but it's kind of fun to see who's visiting my site and what they look at. Understandably, most of the visits are from people I know either in real life or online, but I also get visits from around the world, mostly one-off visits from people who find me via Google or through a referral from a blog where I left a comment. 

Occasionally, though, something kind of jumps out at me. When I checked tonight, I found someone from the Australian Broadcasting Commission in Sydney had visited my blog three times yesterday (presumably because I said nice things about the ABC and its programming). I can only assume that someone on the ABC staff is looking for mentions of their programming online, as they'd have to look fairly hard to stumble over my little corner of the internet. Whatever the details, whoever you are, Aussie friend, thanks for visiting, and I hope you'll leave a comment next time. 
17 Dec 2009

The problem with California

Gerrymandering into "safe" legislative districts means that state senators and assembly members face no serious opposition and can't get voted out of office unless they're caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy. There's no incentive for them to perform, since the initiative/referendum process means they can pawn off the difficult or controversial issues onto the people themselves. Add into that the tendency of the public to vote yes on bond measures and entitlement programs while simultaneously taking away the ability to pay for such things by limiting the ability to collect taxes (see Prop. 13), and then requiring a 2/3 majority vote to pass a simple budget, and you've got a recipe for, well, the disaster we find ourselves in today.

I'm a native Californian, and I'm completely disgusted. We need to rewrite the state constitution to fix these issues, or nothing will ever change.

--My comment on Rod Dreher's blog

12 Dec 2009

The folly of idols

I am deeply aware of the disappointment and hurt that my infidelity has caused to so many people, most of all my wife and children. I want to say again to everyone that I am profoundly sorry and that I ask forgiveness. It may not be possible to repair the damage I've done, but I want to do my best to try.


I would like to ask everyone, including my fans, the good people at my foundation, business partners, the PGA Tour, and my fellow competitors, for their understanding. What's most important now is that my family has the time, privacy, and safe haven we will need for personal healing.


After much soul searching, I have decided to take an indefinite break from professional golf. I need to focus my attention on being a better husband, father, and person.


Again, I ask for privacy for my family and I am especially grateful for all those who have offered compassion and concern during this difficult period. 


--from Tiger Woods' website


Once again, I am led to wonder about a culture that makes role models of ordinary human beings for the silliest of reasons. Tiger Woods is undoubtedly a superior golfer, but let's be absolutely clear about one thing: it means he has the ability to hit a small ball with a large stick and send it in a particular direction, chasing it into a small hole, hitting it fewer times than most others require to achieve the same result. Nothing more, nothing less. He has been very fortunate in that he has been able to parlay this ability into a lucrative career, and it's certainly nothing that I can do, but perhaps you will forgive me if I find this less impressive than, say, finding the cure for polio or devoting one's life to teaching 7th graders (which surely should qualify one for canonization). 


Nevertheless, we live in a society that likes to put people on pedestals, essentially setting them up to fail, then we are surprised to find out that they have feet of clay like the rest of us. It isn't just popular culture, either; the leader of my church, Metropolitan Jonah of the Orthodox Church in America, said at his elevation to the metropolitanate that when it comes to bishops, "What happens to a guy? You put him on a stand in the middle of the church, you dress him up like the Byzantine emperor and you tell him to live forever." And then we're surprised when problems happen.


So when a pro athlete with a beautiful wife, millions of dollars in sponsorships and a jet-set lifestyle turns out to have violated his marriage vows, it becomes front-page news and fodder for all the tabloids and talk radio hosts, and everyone professes shock. Sorry, but I'm not shocked. Tiger Woods has been in the public eye for his entire life--his first TV appearance was on the Mike Douglas Show at the age of 2, putting against Bob Hope. He's enjoyed fabulous success, has played on the finest courses in the world, has traveled around the globe, and has been showered with obscene amounts of money while women were throwing themselves at him at every turn. And then we're surprised that problems happened--that he was less than perfect, that he turned out to be an adult male with a prodigious sexual appetite, that his squeaky-clean image was just that, an image. Oh dear, stop the presses.


And if this is unfair to Tiger Woods and those, like him, who find themselves the fallen idols of an unforgiving public, it's equally bad for said public. Focusing on the private peccadillos of our secular idols does nothing to improve the quality of our own imperfect lives, and we would be far better off giving him and his family the privacy and the time to put their lives back together. Otherwise, it's all just gossip, judgment, and condemnation, and we might as well be flogging ourselves, since all of those things are transgressions, and none of them are salvific.


Note: for those wondering how I can justify the previous post given what I've just written, it's simple: the photo in that post is a moment in time that never happened, kind of a "Dewey Defeats Truman" moment, and I captured and posted it for that reason.  It's not intended to call judgment onto Tiger Woods, and upon consideration I edited out a throwaway line that could have been interpreted that way. It is, however, proof that I too am imperfect, and aspire to be something better than I am. Mea culpa.

11 Dec 2009

Then again, maybe not

Media_httplh6ggphtcom_ruefg

(Seen at a gas station today)


Edit:  I'd also like to point out that the sign is wrong. Sherwood Country Club is not in L.A.  Different city, different county, different zip code, different area code. Different place entirely (for which I am truly thankful).

6 Dec 2009

Sunday morning at St. Herman's

Media_httplh3ggphtcom_cblii

Incense, chant, and icons (some from Mt. Athos). What could be better? Well, next week our bishop will be here. :-)

4 Dec 2009

More thoughts on Google Wave (plus invitations)

Media_httplh5ggphtcom_eatgt

By now, if you're tech-savvy enough to have found this blog (or the pointers to it on my Twitter feed), you've probably heard about Google Wave (if you haven't, look here and here).  It's been heralded as the Next Big Thing, as the replacement for email. and as yet another facet of Google's diabolical plot to take over the world. 

None of that is really true; what it is, as far as I can tell, is a potentially great collaboration tool and a platform upon which another model of communication can be built. I say "potentially" because Google Wave as it stands right now is tremendously disappointing. However, it's currently just a "preview." making it the web equivalent of pre-alpha software, and it will undoubtedly evolve in interesting ways as people bang on it to see what it can do. Google's decision to open it up to invited users was seemingly designed to foster exactly that kind of public hands-on development, rather like letting a bunch of second-graders into a room full of Legos to see what they can create.

The difficulty is that the Wave experience is not exactly an intuitive one. As Gina Trapani put it on the latest edition of This Week in Google, Wave is unapologetic about this, and that it may not necessarily be a bad thing that there is a bit of a barrier to entry.

I disagree. If there is any feeling in the emerging Wave community that a certain level of difficulty is a good thing, they're dead wrong. There's a precedent for this, and it's called Linux. Don't get me wrong--Linux is a fine operating system, as long as you're willing to invest some time in configuration and are comfortable in the command line. But as a mass-market OS, it's largely been a bust. I've heard for years about how this could be "the year of desktop Linux," but it never seems to happen. This is at least in part because while some Linux distributions, such as Ubuntu, have made user-friendliness a priority, there is still a certain segment of the Linux community that will respond to newbie forum questions with "Jeez, all you have to do is sudo gedit xorg.conf. RTFM!" Which is not helpful, to put it mildly.

Rather than duplicate that kind of user experience around Wave, Google needs to do what Google does best, which is to innovate and make things simple but relatively powerful, if somewhat unpolished. Take Gmail, for example--compared with Hotmail or Yahoo, it's an untraditional email user interface, but most people can grasp what everything is, how it works, and adapt to it fairly quickly. Wave needs to do the same. On the surface, the Wave interface looks simple enough (see photo above), but you can spend a couple of hours playing with it and still not figure out how to do something simple, unless of course you've taken the precaution of reading the ambitiously-named Complete Guide to Google Wave. So far, the innovation part is happening, and there is definitely power there; the making things simple is hopefully still to come. It's completely understandable that Wave in its current form is primarily useful only for techies and early adopters, but if it is to have a future with the general public, it can't be another geek fortress.

And now, the offer: if you've read this far, haven't been scared off, are curious about how Wave works, and would like to try it yourself, I have invitations and I am giving them away to anyone who wants one. All you have to do is go to my Wave invitation page and fill out the form. When I run out of invitations, I'll take down the form. Sound like a plan? Great. Then go fill it out, and I'll see you in Wave!

Larry Anderson's Space

Hi, I'm Larry--a native Californian, an Orthodox Christian, a history buff, a sci-fi fan, and an unashamed geek. I live in beautiful Ventura, California, and am married to the most beautiful woman in the world (hi, honey!).

Contact Me


Follow iLazarus on Twitter



Ask me a question anonymously




Creative Commons License

Original content on all of my sites is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.